Case Studies · Coming Soon

Real Installations, Measured — Coming Soon

Proof-of-concept live Measured, not claimed Honest results

We're documenting our real Aran installations — starting with our proof-of-concept plant. We'd rather show you measured proof and real site photos than stock images and round numbers, so we're gathering verified data first. It's coming soon.

See the numbers early

Why this page is honest about "coming soon"

Anyone can put a stock photo and a big percentage on a case-study page. We won't. Our proof-of-concept plant is running, and we're collecting real photos and verified generation data before we publish. When it goes up here, every number will be measured — the good and any limitations.

What our case studies will show

Real site photos

Actual Aran installations on real Indian sites — not stock imagery.

Measured generation

The power the tracker actually made, metered against a fixed baseline.

Site conditions

Location, climate and dust — the real conditions behind the numbers.

Honest results

What worked well, and anything that didn't — stated plainly.

Proof-of-concept plant — documentation in progress

Our proof-of-concept install is up and running. We're capturing site photos and verified generation data now, and we'll publish the full write-up here as soon as it's ready.

Illustrative default values — request a site-specific quotation. Published case studies will use measured data from the specific site.

What every solar investor should understand

We share this openly — informed investors make better decisions, and better decisions build stronger partnerships.

The hidden risk

Your panels may age far faster than the datasheet claims

Datasheets promise 25 years — tested in a lab, not in India's 40°C+ heat and humidity. In real conditions, panels often degrade faster and effective plant life can fall below 15 years, well short of the financial model.

The Aran tracker's raised structure and airflow keep panels cooler, slowing that ageing and holding output closer to the design curve.

Read the full guide
The upgrade trap

Fixed structures become a liability as panels improve

Panel technology jumps every year. On a fixed structure, new panel sizes mean tearing it out and rebuilding — full civil work and cost again.

The Aran tracker structure reuses across panel generations — new panels just mount and connect. Your first investment keeps working.

Tracker vs fixed: the numbers
The smart capital decision

The Aran structure is a long-term asset — not a sunk cost

Because the structure accepts future panels without replacement, your money is spent once on a platform that keeps earning. When you upgrade panels in year 12 or 15, a fixed plant faces a costly full rebuild (often 30–50% of the original cost) — an Aran plant simply swaps the panels. Spend on the structure, spend prudently on panels, and upgrade as technology improves.

Common questions

Why aren't the case studies published yet?

We'd rather publish measured proof than stock photos and round numbers. Our proof-of-concept plant is running, and we're gathering verified generation data and real site photos before we put anything on the page. It's coming soon.

What will the case studies show?

Real installations with site photos, the measured power the tracker generated against a fixed baseline, the site conditions, and honest results — the good and any limitations. No exaggerated claims.

Can I see the numbers before they're published?

Yes. Talk to our team and, where we can share it, we'll walk you through what our proof-of-concept plant is generating and how it's measured. Tell us about your site and we'll relate it to your case.

Want to see the proof early?

Tell us about your site and we'll walk you through what our proof-of-concept plant is generating, and what it could mean for you — with an illustrative estimate. No obligation.

We'll get back fast — or reach us on reach@arantec.in

Thanks — we've got your details and will get back to you soon.

Back to home